The only logical way to begin such an analysis is to start with the films that established the series, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone and the Chamber of Secrets, both directed by Christopher Columbus. HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER’S STONE AND THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS I also will not go into detail on the plot and story of each film as this analysis assumes that you have seen them and know the information. Therefore, no comparisons to the novels will be made on my part. ![]() It’s preferable that a critic of the films, who also happens to be a fan of their book counterparts, only discuss what’s present on the screen to prevent the discussion from becoming off-topic with irrelevancies and disappointments of inaccurate, minute details. This type of criticism does not consist of nitpicks and complaints on what aspects of the books should not have been excluded. Rowling wrote because that tends to bog down legitimate criticism. ![]() The Harry Potter film series will soon come to an end and what better way to acknowledge that than by analyzing the series? What are the positive and negative attributes? What are the best and worst aspects? How well do the creators perform their task of keeping the audience engaged and intrigued? Read on to find out how I, a fan of no importance, answer these inquiries.Īs a fan of the novels (the last five, anyway), I no longer compare the films to what author J.K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |